Skip to main content

Phase of DMAIC in which tool is most commonly used




Tool Name
Phase of DMAIC in which tool is most commonly used
 (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control)
D
M
A
I
C
Affinity Diagram
·

·


Brainstorming


·
·

Business case
·




Cause and Effect Diagrams


·


Project Charter
·




Consensus



·

Control Charts
For continuous Data
Individuals
X-Bar, R
EWMA
For discrete data
P,nP
C,U  

·
·
·
·
CTQ (Critical To Quality) Tree
·




Data Collection Forms
Check Sheet
Frequency Plot Check Sheet
Confirmation Check Sheet
Concentration Diagram

·
·
·
·
Data Collection Plan

·
·
·
·
Design Of Experiments
Full Factorial
Reduced Fractions
Screening Designs
Plackett-Burnham Designs
More than Two Levels


·
·

Flow Diagrams
·
·
·
·
·
Frequency Plots

·
·
·
·
FMEA (Failure Mode And Effect Analysis)

·

·

Gage R&R

·



Hypothesis Tests
T-Test
Paired t-test
ANOVA
Chi Square


·


Kano Model

·



Planning Tools
Gantt Charts
Planning Grid



·

Pareto Charts

·
·
·

Prioritization Matrix

·

·

Process Capability

·

·

Process Sigma

·

·

Quality Control Process Chart




·
Regression


·


Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY)
·




Sampling

·
·
·
·
Scatter Plots


·


SIPOC
·




Stakeholder Analysis
·


·

Standardization




·
Stratification

·
·
·
·
Stratified Frequency Plots


·


Times Series Plot (Run Charts)

·



VOC (Voice Of Customer)
·




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

10 Ways to Failure for a New Six Sigma Deployment

10 Ways to Failure for a New Six Sigma Deployment The returns from a well-deployed Six Sigma initiative can be richly rewarding. The results of many business organizations stand in testimony to that. But the opposite also is true. Ten major points are critical to the success or failure of a Six Sigma deployment. Here the points are outlined as the 10 ways that a Six Sigma initiative can fail: 1- Lack of Commitment from the Top 2- Part-time Black Belts 3- Projects Not Linked to Organizational Objectives 4- Focusing on Quantity Instead of Quality 5- No Review Mechanism 6- No Visible Reward and Recognition Mechanism 7- No Infrastructural Support to Teams Working on Projects 8- Copy-and-Paste Deployment 9- Too Much Insistence on Statistics and Tools 10- Expecting Too Much and Too Soon - Ref: www.isixsigma.com
15 comments
Read more

Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) and Crystal Ball Case Study

Background In this case study, we are a compressor manufacturer in the process of developing a new type of compressor. Our project team was charged with developing the design for the compressor using Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) tools and techniques. As we worked through the DMA DV (Define, Measure, Analyze, Design, Verify) process, we used simulation and optimization to provide project justification, lend insight into the critical drivers of quality, and help create a cost effective design th at meets customer requirements. For DFSS, critical benefits of simulation and optimization are the ability to prototype new products or processes without an appreciable investment of time or money, minimal defects, and sales driven through improved customer satisfaction. Define The first step in our Six Sigma process was to estimate the financial impact of this project. We started by developing a simple spreadsheet model (DFSS Case Study Defin e.xls) in Microsoft ® Excel to take into ...
13 comments
Read more

Variation is a serious thing

Many parts have to fit together to make a product, like a cell phone. When engineers design the parts, they account for the fact that all parts will display some amount of variation as they are produced. Variation is the degree to which a part, product, service, or transaction differs from all others in the same class or category. In the case of a phone, each class of parts, like the plastic casting, vary in size, weight, and even color. Just as the phone cases vary, so does the clear plastic display that covers the liquid crystal display. Then you have the many hinges, buttons, antenna, internal component, and so on. All these parts have to snap and fit together well if the phone is to perform its function to your satisfaction. In other words, you can only tolerate a certain amount of variation. A little too much variation and the phone won’t work property. A little more variation and it won’t work at all. And we all know who’s going to end up with the bad phone, right?
3 comments
Read more